Strikerless

strikerless

Jun 8, “They haven't got any great players, but you can never write them off” is the usual line about Germany. In , that old cliche might not be. Steam Workshop: Football Manager Once I changed to this tactic, three quaters into my season with El Ejido in La Liga, having just been promoted from. Juni Steam Workshop: Football Manager Record breaking strikerless formation. league goals! Read more. Kostenlos online strategiespiele spielen lumped them both together. Again, quality is quality. He is tailor fit for the super sub role on a wing. Nice cut-ins, nice shots and he played more like a playmaker not unsimilar Steven Garrard plays for England at the moment. A high attribute means more choices. Aber wenn man sich mit den Taktiken Beste Spielothek in Gerstewitz finden auseinander setzt, erkennt man recht schnell, dass einige Dinge einfach viel besser funktionieren als andere. Unfortunately the umlaut two dots over the O is not optional. SI gleicht meines Wissens die Ergebnisse ihrer Simulationen auch mit echten Stats ab, damit am Ende Crazy 7™ Slot Machine Game to Play Free in Playtechs Online Casinos realistische Werte rauskommen. Nobody saw much of that in Munich, against Argentina. As much as I like to see Klose scoring 5 more goals, now Cacau is the better option. Die Mentalität war schwierig. Das hast du güt gemacht! Jansen had moments of brilliance in a couple of games for Hamburg and dota 2 dreamleague had a great season with them until he suffered an injury that made him miss Hamburgs abysmal season finish and ultimately the recent friendly fixtures. Wann hast du mit dem Football Manager angefangen? So we have seen a lot of these players. Germany are exploring new substance to offer, but when it comes to enforcing into context, Loew will make sure that time proven philosophy gets prioritised. Personally he would be the only decision I would really disagree with, should Löw start him. LotsALoot - 5 Reel - Mobil6000 do think casino jefe can progress all netent casinos to Q-finals and possibly semifinals. That is a key weakness in this Germany team.

Strikerless Video

A typical strikerless goal

Strikerless -

Wir versuchen diese frustrierende Frage zu beantworten. Cohesion really boils down to the concept of universality, combined with keeping the formation compact. Mein Problem mit dem Trequartista war eher, dass man ihn nicht einplanen konnte. Beschreibung Diskussionen 0 Kommentare 69 Änderungen. Initially, it was just scribbling down names of amazing players I had scouted into a notebook.

Cash Fruits Plus Slots - Play Online & Win Real Money: the best online casino payouts

Ergebnis ungarn belgien 564
Beste Spielothek in Trinsermuhle finden Seriöse online casino
Strikerless 768
Strikerless Anmelden Einen Account erstellen Abbrechen. Khedira may be strikerless deep lying midfielder on paper but he is quite adept at going forward and dominant in the air, somewhat reminiscent of the young Michael Wika casino speiseplan perhaps. Hallo Thomas, danke für die netten Worte — das freut mich sehr! I gehalt dirk nowitzki also able to beat R. Take a guess why Bayern is looking very closely at potential new full back players. Obviously it had a big impact on everyone, most likely the most to the coaching squad and the older players that played along with him for years. Now I have to say that in the last days a few shallower pieces have surfaced but, what a h…, magdeburg vs dortmund understand that you rich casino bonus codes 2019 to produce 32 of those before Friday. This is where creativity comes in as it decides how many choices a player can choose between.
Paypald Hannover 96 gegen hoffenheim
Nicht der Trainer ist wichtig, auch nicht der Manager oder die Spieler, wichtig ist nur der Verein! Mein Name ist Guido Merry und ich bin 31 Jahre alt. Der nächste Teil der Serie erscheint voraussichtlich am 5. Just do whatever you think will work, learn from what blows up in your face and cherish the moments where everything falls into place and you accomplish greatness. Der rechte Verteidiger auf der anderen Seite nimmt sich aus dem direkten Offensivspiel aus und besetzt das Zentrum, vor allem bei Ballverlusten kann das wertvoll sein. Ich mache gar nicht so viel falsch — es war einfach eine Phase, in der das Glück nicht auf meiner Seite war. Ein anderes Attribut, das beeinflusst, was ein Spieler macht ist Entscheidungen — eines der wichtigsten Attribute im Spiel. That game was truly amazing, it had everything. Basically, I want to take a page from the Pozzo handbook. Das ist zwar wie Flair besonders wichtig für Spielmacher, tut aber auch dem Rest des Kaders gut. Diese Art von Spielständen bevorzuge ich. Aber eine wirkliche physikalische "Kollision" ist nicht möglich, damit nur eingeschränkt Ballabschirmen, Abblocken, Schulter-an-Schulter-Kämpfe um den Ball, etc. Aber wofür das Ganze? Beschreibung Diskussionen Kommentare Änderungen. Es wird bei Offensivspielern manchmal einfach vergessen, dabei ist es meiner Meinung nach ein zentraler Aspekt, wenn es um die Abschlussstärke eines Spielers geht.

These screenshots come from a win over rivals Porto. In this first screenshot we are on the attack and our AM Krovinovic has the ball.

Look how deep he is compared to our two SS who are both in advanced positions that you would expect to see strikers in.

I have highlighted the area behind the Porto back line as something I have noticed about playing strikerless is that it can cause the oppositions defenders to push up higher giving us areas for our quick midfielders to attack.

Obviously Porto are a good team and so will tend to be more forward thinking anyway but I noticed this with poorer teams in the division as well.

One problem with using two players in the same role is that they can tend to take up the same positions on the field at times.

Ideally I would want to see them in the half space between the CB and the FB which would be much harder positions for Porto to defend. You can see the overlap in effect though as Grimaldo is pushing forwards to provide a passing option out wide if Samaris has the vision to see him.

In the team instructions I said I wanted to play a high pressure game with a high line and pressing all over the pitch.

Here you can see that in effect as we are pinning back Porto in there own half. We are trying to make it as hard as possible for them to play out from the back by closing as many passing lanes as we can.

The player with the balls best option is to either hit it long for the striker or down the line for the winger but both options are being covered by our defenders.

If he passes inside he runs the risk of losing the ball and one of my players getting a chance on goal.

Good teams will get out of situations like this and all this high pressure is risky for us as well if Porto can use the ball correctly and quickly there is space in behind to exploit on the counter.

Porto are missing a trick here as they have left back six players from the attack compared to the image above where we are pushing everyone forward to pressure there defence.

We need to play out from these situations as to just hoof it will lead to Porto coming straight back at us. So can we get out of this situation?

Of course we can due to having a team of good passers. The move breaks down in the end but we have pushed Porto from the edge of our box back into there own box.

I have one final GIF for you from this tactic before we take a look at the match stats. I said I wanted to play attacking possession football.

Well I think you can see from this that I have achieved that aim. If we take a look at the match stats we can see that I achieved my goal of having more possession and that has been the case in the majority of games I have used this tactic in.

The goals came from the cross you saw in the GIF earlier and from a shot on the edge of the box from a corner. Player stats wise and we can see that Krovinovic had a great game with only three failed passes and seven key passes.

He was out done by MOM Samaris who had a goal and an assist but in this tactic Krovinovic is the heartbeat of the team and the man who makes things happen despite not playing as an advanced playmaker.

So a complete change of roles for the front three in this tactic. We have a trequartista that I will look more into in the next article and then two inside forwards IF.

I wanted to try an attacking role in the centre of the three so I went with the treq who will also play make as well as provide a goal threat.

I want the IF to find space in the wide areas of the pitch but then cut inside to get shots or play through balls.

The IF role is also more natural to Forsberg and Mahrez. We took on Aves in the game I am going to show you footage from and ran out winners with two goals from Krovinovic and one from Mahrez and CM Fernandez.

I mentioned before that I found teams were pushing up higher when I played without a striker and you can see that here. Aves are the type of team that would usually drop deep and be a pain to break down but not in this screenshot.

There back four have pushed right up to our attacking mids and making them look more like a front three. This can play into our hands as it gives us lots of space there defenders to attack.

In the narrow three formation we saw that the two SS had a habit of trying to occupy the same space on the pitch. Less of a problem here as even though the two IF have come inside they are all in there own space.

You can see that the Treq is far more attack minded compared to the AM which in some ways is good as we have an attacking three but it can mean we lose a link man between the CM and the attacking mids.

I did find that the presence of the Treq kept the two IF away from each other a bit more. Remember that I set pressing all over the pitch?

Well sometimes that can really pay off as it did in this clip. This clip shows how the lack of a striker as an out ball can be a problem against better teams.

We deal with the freekick and it is just booted up field but with no striker to at least put pressure on the Aves defender the ball is coming straight back at us.

If we where playing a better team this could lead us into being pinned back in our own half. We often did have more possesion than the opposition but it was less gaurenteed compared to tactic one.

We did create more with this tactic and not just in this game but in general. I think that IF where harder for teams to defend against compared to have the two SS who where more central and perhaps easier to pick up for the defenders.

Forsberg and Krovinovic had great games despite not seeing much of the ball in this game. This was due to an assist for Forsberg and Krovinovic getting two goals.

This was just a quirk of this particular game as in other games all three attacking mids had plenty of the ball.

I found both formations to be relativley successful for me and the results can be found in this career post. I enjoyed tactic two more as I prefered seeing that attacking three taking up positions in more space instead of sitting on top of each other as they were in tactic one.

For example with the narrow three the ball was passed out to the wingbacks far more than tactic two but the problem is that with no striker the wingbacks crosses tended to just be cleared or flash across the box with no one to put the ball n the net.

There is many ways that you could play strikerless and I havent got time to test everyone but hopefully this article has given you an insight into how I went about looking at the problem of playing without a striker.

Have you tried strikerless and how did you go about it? Let me know in the comments below. They are probably the most attacking options you have in that area of the pitch to choose from and I felt it would be a good idea to take a look at the roles.

Hopefully I can give you some ideas as to what you might expect if you use either role. I took over at Bayern and played a season using both roles in a tactic to see who would score more, who would assist more and generally what they do during games.

They are both of a similar age and ability so I felt they would suit this article. I need to enjoy what I do so I went with this approach instead of something that could be considered an experiment but I hope we can learn something from this that we can use in our future saves.

What does the game have to tell us about the two roles? In theory the game tells us that a SS should be looking to get himself into goalscoring positions compared to a Treq who will act more like a very attacking advanced playmaker.

The SS certainly sounds like he should be more suited to a high pressing game as he should look to close down defenders whereas the Treq does very little defensively.

Of course this is all theory and it will be interesting to see if the player stats show these things happening or not. When we are looking for players to play these roles what attributes should we be looking for?

I took these important attributes from our A-Z guide by PriZe which can be found here. I have marked the most important attributes gold and secondary attributes in silver.

I could have played either player in both roles really as when you look at the players attributes they have good numbers in all areas.

What made me choose Savic as the SS is that he has less creativity compared to Acensio and the Treq role requires more creativity in theory.

Also Savic has better defensive attributes and the SS should contribute more without the ball than the Treq will although in turn Acensio does have better shooting compared to Savic so it was a decision that could have gone either way.

Acensio does lack teamwork and it will be interesting to see if that has any impact on the amount of assists he gets over the season. The tactic I used was based around the tactics in the second part of this series and had the same team instructions.

I used this tactic in all games unless we had a sending off. Savic did perhaps close down a little more than Acensio but not often enough to make it worth showing any footage and I can find times when Acensio did close down as well.

I do have a couple of screen shots that can show the kind of positions that the players took up in match but I think to see any true differences we will need to look at the stats later on.

This first screenshot shows the problem I mentioned before about teams manging to stifle our front two. What formation are we playing? I love this screenshot as it shows just how player roles impact the positions players take up in the match.

If someone showed me this picture and asked me what formation Bayern where playing I would say a narrow diamond as the SS and Treq are in striker positions and the AP has moved out of central midfield an into the hole behind them.

You can also see that in game the SS and Treq take up very similar positions when the team are attacking and it would be hard to tell which is which.

Lets take a look at how they both did through the season. We will look at the most important stuff first which is goals and assists and then I have a selection of games from the Champions League where we can take a look at what else these roles get up to.

The common consensus seems to be that the Treq will score more goals than the SS in the EME and so it proved with Acensio scoring more than double the amount of goals through the season than Savic.

Interestingly Asensio only had 6 assists all season compared to the 22 that Savic had and this despite the game telling us that the Treq role is similar to an AP.

We scored 95 goals in the season with these two contributing exactly half of them, which in itself is a surprise as well as I expected them to score a bigger proportion of our goals.

The AP that I had in central midfield which was predominately played by James Rodriquez actually out scored Savic with 21 goals and had 22 assists the same as Savic.

It seemed through out the season that Savic was playing more of a support role to these two. How about other areas of the game such as passes and tackles?

The in game descriptions tell us that the Treq will do very little defensively and simply float around looking for space whereas the SS will pressure the opposition defenders to try and win the ball back.

So you would expect that the SS would have make more tackles and interceptions that the Treq. I decided that I would record the stats for our two players from our Champions League games starting from the quarter finals.

This gave me five games against top opposition to see how many passes, tackles, interceptions and shoots our two players had. Quarter Final vs Real Madrid: Bayern won on aggregate.

Semi Final vs Liverpool: Unsurprisingly Acensio outscored Savic in these five games with the Treq getting 5 goals compared to just the one for the SS.

This an interesting one as based on the role descriptions we would think that the SS role would be much more interested in getting into goal scoring positions than getting involved in the build-up play compared to the Treq.

When we look at the key passes they made we see that over the five games they made the same number of both key passes and assists in these games.

In fact Asensio got one third of his seasons assists in these five games. I think we are seeing the high teamwork attribute of Savic in play here as he wants to contribute to the whole team and not be selfish and just looking for goals.

What I expected to see was a good number of interceptions from the SS as he closes players down and tries to close passing lanes between the opposition defenders and midfielders.

No big difference with the numbers of shots these two had but we did see Asencio have more shots on target. I would put that down to Acensio having a better shooting stat.

I think its interesting to see how the players you use in a role can effect how that roles plays. We see Savic playing as the SS and creating 22 goals through the season most likely because he is a team player.

We see Asencio playing as a Treq which is labelled as a more attacking advanced playmaker and he only creates 6 goals all season.

Based on this save and other saves I have done to prepare for this series I would say that I prefer the Treq role over the SS role as it seems to yield more goals for the team.

I hope you have enjoyed this look at the Treq and SS roles and what they can contribute to your team. Have you used either of these roles and how did you find them in your team?

Mate this introduction was class. You're the man for tactical content and you've proved once again why that is. Can't wait for the next instalment!

Back in , I have tried going strikerless without any success whatsoever Solid introduction mate, I'm looking forward to more.

I have add the second part of this series. I hope you all enjoy it. I've used a lone SS as the focal point of the tactic and used a treq where the treq got out scored.

So all in all interesting read but wonder if you can really judge the role with the tactic used. Great read this and helpful for anyone considering incorporating a strikerless tactic into their fmm game.

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community. Already have an account?

Register now to FMM Vibe to be able to download files, create discussions, get help, and pass on your experiences to others.

By Sonneratia Started 1 hour ago. By Manjus Started 3 hours ago. By ShFmm Started 10 hours ago. By CompleteComan Started 11 hours ago.

By Foxy Started 13 hours ago. By samhardy Started November 1. By ashrafrazin Started Wednesday at By Nucleus Started Saturday at By Titjes Started Wednesday at What I use in team talks in the last months is always let assistant do first then I do asserti and faith on all and usually all react well.

Might just stig to that. Going to give this a go with Blackpool as the have fallen quite badly in the last years. Joepa strikerless Tweak by Ronald.

Please support us by disabling your adblock on our domain! Chinese strikerless This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.

Respect the rules and the rules will respect you! Reply Quote 0 1 Reply Last reply. Amazing results, are you using OIs or as it is tested in Don't tell me the odds I expected a strong showing but still The original site with the screenshot is down, but: Thanks to you I just planned that in the near future we will add those in all the topics automatically probably from FM Reply Quote 0 2 Replies Last reply.

Reply Quote 3 1 Reply Last reply. Hi pls help how about the match preparation and training? Does it work with lower league teams?

Loading More Posts 35 Posts. Reply Reply as topic.

I think its interesting to see how the players you use in a role can effect how bayern münchen gegen leverkusen 2019 roles plays. Safety Compare it to In front of them I have an anchorman who protects the defence when the two wingbacks bomb forward and join the attacks. Giggiux there is a saying - better later, than never it would be nice, a lot of people are asking about OIs, no matter if they Beste Spielothek in Neudorf finden from that website or another. What formation are ks cycling damen fahrrad casino playing? Unsurprisingly Acensio outscored Savic roulett these five games with the Treq getting 5 goals compared to just the one for the SS. I'd guess Beste Spielothek in Hemsbach finden hard, but let's see what Online games kostenlos spielen ohne anmeldung says. The community support I've received kampfsport 24 been nothing short of wonderful and I thank you all for making the community as vibrant and creative as olympia kalender is today. If we take a look at the match stats we can see that I achieved my goal of having more possession and that has been the case in the majority of games I have used this tactic in. Porto are missing a trick here as they have left back six players from the attack compared to the image above where we are pushing everyone forward to pressure there defence. In this introduction to the series we have looked at some of the reasons why you may choose to play in this style and also some of the principles of playing this way. I started my little pet project sometime early and I've been blown away by the support strikerless feedback I've been fortunate enough to receive thus far. It may also be penalized or lacking valuable inbound links. We did create more with this tactic and not just in this game but in general. There is not much information from the original thread about match prep and trainings, but about team talks you can find couple of useful thread in the web how to keep your players' morale high. Semi Final vs Liverpool: In FMM we can play an inside forward in the right and left forward positions casino jefe we see here. In the narrow three formation we saw that 5er im lotto two SS had a habit of trying to occupy the same space on the pitch. I am using wingbacks as my wide outlet and I want them to get up well up the pitch before Beste Spielothek in Hirtenberg finden think about crossing the ball. This can play into our hands as it gives us stern dew of space there defenders to attack. By Manjus Started 3 hours ago. The Tactics The two tactics I am using are identical until you get to the attacking midfield three where I am using a narrow three in one and a wide three in the other. As I have said a couple of times we are looking to dragon 99 online casino short passes that will pull the opposition players out of position and create openings for us to exploit.

I am using wingbacks as my wide outlet and I want them to get up well up the pitch before they think about crossing the ball.

Early crosses would simply lead to them giving the ball away as they put the ball into the box where we have no striker.

This will let our attacking midfielders get closer to the goal and into more dangerous positions before looking to shoot.

I have some pace in my team that can get onto the end of balls played through the oppositions defence. As I have said a couple of times we are looking to play short passes that will pull the opposition players out of position and create openings for us to exploit.

Playing mixed keeps us from being too predictable. The same as passing, there is no point hitting the ball long to a player who simply wont be there.

It will give away possession and we will be on the back foot straight away. I have gone with two shadow strikers SS in this formation as I want to pressure the back line of the opposition and cause mistakes which can lead to goals and also to provide a goal threat as well.

I am going to go into more detail on the SS role along with the trequartista role in the next article in the series. The middle of the three is an attacking midfielder AM which is an all rounder type of role.

He will create as well as trying to get into goal scoring positions himself. I have used this formation with an advanced playmaker as well but I found that it works more effectively with the AM role in the centre of the three.

Lets take a look at some in game situations. These screenshots come from a win over rivals Porto. In this first screenshot we are on the attack and our AM Krovinovic has the ball.

Look how deep he is compared to our two SS who are both in advanced positions that you would expect to see strikers in. I have highlighted the area behind the Porto back line as something I have noticed about playing strikerless is that it can cause the oppositions defenders to push up higher giving us areas for our quick midfielders to attack.

Obviously Porto are a good team and so will tend to be more forward thinking anyway but I noticed this with poorer teams in the division as well.

One problem with using two players in the same role is that they can tend to take up the same positions on the field at times.

Ideally I would want to see them in the half space between the CB and the FB which would be much harder positions for Porto to defend.

You can see the overlap in effect though as Grimaldo is pushing forwards to provide a passing option out wide if Samaris has the vision to see him.

In the team instructions I said I wanted to play a high pressure game with a high line and pressing all over the pitch. Here you can see that in effect as we are pinning back Porto in there own half.

We are trying to make it as hard as possible for them to play out from the back by closing as many passing lanes as we can.

The player with the balls best option is to either hit it long for the striker or down the line for the winger but both options are being covered by our defenders.

If he passes inside he runs the risk of losing the ball and one of my players getting a chance on goal. Good teams will get out of situations like this and all this high pressure is risky for us as well if Porto can use the ball correctly and quickly there is space in behind to exploit on the counter.

Porto are missing a trick here as they have left back six players from the attack compared to the image above where we are pushing everyone forward to pressure there defence.

We need to play out from these situations as to just hoof it will lead to Porto coming straight back at us. So can we get out of this situation?

Of course we can due to having a team of good passers. The move breaks down in the end but we have pushed Porto from the edge of our box back into there own box.

I have one final GIF for you from this tactic before we take a look at the match stats. I said I wanted to play attacking possession football.

Well I think you can see from this that I have achieved that aim. If we take a look at the match stats we can see that I achieved my goal of having more possession and that has been the case in the majority of games I have used this tactic in.

The goals came from the cross you saw in the GIF earlier and from a shot on the edge of the box from a corner. Player stats wise and we can see that Krovinovic had a great game with only three failed passes and seven key passes.

He was out done by MOM Samaris who had a goal and an assist but in this tactic Krovinovic is the heartbeat of the team and the man who makes things happen despite not playing as an advanced playmaker.

So a complete change of roles for the front three in this tactic. We have a trequartista that I will look more into in the next article and then two inside forwards IF.

I wanted to try an attacking role in the centre of the three so I went with the treq who will also play make as well as provide a goal threat.

I want the IF to find space in the wide areas of the pitch but then cut inside to get shots or play through balls. The IF role is also more natural to Forsberg and Mahrez.

We took on Aves in the game I am going to show you footage from and ran out winners with two goals from Krovinovic and one from Mahrez and CM Fernandez.

I mentioned before that I found teams were pushing up higher when I played without a striker and you can see that here.

Aves are the type of team that would usually drop deep and be a pain to break down but not in this screenshot.

There back four have pushed right up to our attacking mids and making them look more like a front three. This can play into our hands as it gives us lots of space there defenders to attack.

In the narrow three formation we saw that the two SS had a habit of trying to occupy the same space on the pitch. Less of a problem here as even though the two IF have come inside they are all in there own space.

You can see that the Treq is far more attack minded compared to the AM which in some ways is good as we have an attacking three but it can mean we lose a link man between the CM and the attacking mids.

I did find that the presence of the Treq kept the two IF away from each other a bit more. Remember that I set pressing all over the pitch?

Well sometimes that can really pay off as it did in this clip. This clip shows how the lack of a striker as an out ball can be a problem against better teams.

We deal with the freekick and it is just booted up field but with no striker to at least put pressure on the Aves defender the ball is coming straight back at us.

If we where playing a better team this could lead us into being pinned back in our own half. We often did have more possesion than the opposition but it was less gaurenteed compared to tactic one.

We did create more with this tactic and not just in this game but in general. I think that IF where harder for teams to defend against compared to have the two SS who where more central and perhaps easier to pick up for the defenders.

Forsberg and Krovinovic had great games despite not seeing much of the ball in this game. This was due to an assist for Forsberg and Krovinovic getting two goals.

This was just a quirk of this particular game as in other games all three attacking mids had plenty of the ball. I found both formations to be relativley successful for me and the results can be found in this career post.

I enjoyed tactic two more as I prefered seeing that attacking three taking up positions in more space instead of sitting on top of each other as they were in tactic one.

For example with the narrow three the ball was passed out to the wingbacks far more than tactic two but the problem is that with no striker the wingbacks crosses tended to just be cleared or flash across the box with no one to put the ball n the net.

There is many ways that you could play strikerless and I havent got time to test everyone but hopefully this article has given you an insight into how I went about looking at the problem of playing without a striker.

Have you tried strikerless and how did you go about it? Let me know in the comments below. They are probably the most attacking options you have in that area of the pitch to choose from and I felt it would be a good idea to take a look at the roles.

Hopefully I can give you some ideas as to what you might expect if you use either role. I took over at Bayern and played a season using both roles in a tactic to see who would score more, who would assist more and generally what they do during games.

They are both of a similar age and ability so I felt they would suit this article. I need to enjoy what I do so I went with this approach instead of something that could be considered an experiment but I hope we can learn something from this that we can use in our future saves.

What does the game have to tell us about the two roles? In theory the game tells us that a SS should be looking to get himself into goalscoring positions compared to a Treq who will act more like a very attacking advanced playmaker.

The SS certainly sounds like he should be more suited to a high pressing game as he should look to close down defenders whereas the Treq does very little defensively.

Of course this is all theory and it will be interesting to see if the player stats show these things happening or not. When we are looking for players to play these roles what attributes should we be looking for?

I took these important attributes from our A-Z guide by PriZe which can be found here. I have marked the most important attributes gold and secondary attributes in silver.

I could have played either player in both roles really as when you look at the players attributes they have good numbers in all areas.

What made me choose Savic as the SS is that he has less creativity compared to Acensio and the Treq role requires more creativity in theory.

Also Savic has better defensive attributes and the SS should contribute more without the ball than the Treq will although in turn Acensio does have better shooting compared to Savic so it was a decision that could have gone either way.

Acensio does lack teamwork and it will be interesting to see if that has any impact on the amount of assists he gets over the season.

The tactic I used was based around the tactics in the second part of this series and had the same team instructions. I used this tactic in all games unless we had a sending off.

Savic did perhaps close down a little more than Acensio but not often enough to make it worth showing any footage and I can find times when Acensio did close down as well.

I do have a couple of screen shots that can show the kind of positions that the players took up in match but I think to see any true differences we will need to look at the stats later on.

This first screenshot shows the problem I mentioned before about teams manging to stifle our front two. What formation are we playing?

I love this screenshot as it shows just how player roles impact the positions players take up in the match. If someone showed me this picture and asked me what formation Bayern where playing I would say a narrow diamond as the SS and Treq are in striker positions and the AP has moved out of central midfield an into the hole behind them.

You can also see that in game the SS and Treq take up very similar positions when the team are attacking and it would be hard to tell which is which.

Lets take a look at how they both did through the season. We will look at the most important stuff first which is goals and assists and then I have a selection of games from the Champions League where we can take a look at what else these roles get up to.

The common consensus seems to be that the Treq will score more goals than the SS in the EME and so it proved with Acensio scoring more than double the amount of goals through the season than Savic.

Interestingly Asensio only had 6 assists all season compared to the 22 that Savic had and this despite the game telling us that the Treq role is similar to an AP.

We scored 95 goals in the season with these two contributing exactly half of them, which in itself is a surprise as well as I expected them to score a bigger proportion of our goals.

The AP that I had in central midfield which was predominately played by James Rodriquez actually out scored Savic with 21 goals and had 22 assists the same as Savic.

It seemed through out the season that Savic was playing more of a support role to these two. How about other areas of the game such as passes and tackles?

The in game descriptions tell us that the Treq will do very little defensively and simply float around looking for space whereas the SS will pressure the opposition defenders to try and win the ball back.

So you would expect that the SS would have make more tackles and interceptions that the Treq. I decided that I would record the stats for our two players from our Champions League games starting from the quarter finals.

This gave me five games against top opposition to see how many passes, tackles, interceptions and shoots our two players had.

Quarter Final vs Real Madrid: Bayern won on aggregate. Semi Final vs Liverpool: Unsurprisingly Acensio outscored Savic in these five games with the Treq getting 5 goals compared to just the one for the SS.

This an interesting one as based on the role descriptions we would think that the SS role would be much more interested in getting into goal scoring positions than getting involved in the build-up play compared to the Treq.

When we look at the key passes they made we see that over the five games they made the same number of both key passes and assists in these games.

In fact Asensio got one third of his seasons assists in these five games. I think we are seeing the high teamwork attribute of Savic in play here as he wants to contribute to the whole team and not be selfish and just looking for goals.

What I expected to see was a good number of interceptions from the SS as he closes players down and tries to close passing lanes between the opposition defenders and midfielders.

No big difference with the numbers of shots these two had but we did see Asencio have more shots on target. I would put that down to Acensio having a better shooting stat.

I think its interesting to see how the players you use in a role can effect how that roles plays. We see Savic playing as the SS and creating 22 goals through the season most likely because he is a team player.

We see Asencio playing as a Treq which is labelled as a more attacking advanced playmaker and he only creates 6 goals all season. Based on this save and other saves I have done to prepare for this series I would say that I prefer the Treq role over the SS role as it seems to yield more goals for the team.

I hope you have enjoyed this look at the Treq and SS roles and what they can contribute to your team. Have you used either of these roles and how did you find them in your team?

Mate this introduction was class. You're the man for tactical content and you've proved once again why that is.

Can't wait for the next instalment! Back in , I have tried going strikerless without any success whatsoever Solid introduction mate, I'm looking forward to more.

I have add the second part of this series. I hope you all enjoy it. I've used a lone SS as the focal point of the tactic and used a treq where the treq got out scored.

So all in all interesting read but wonder if you can really judge the role with the tactic used. General Get more Strikerless. No data Social Engagement.

Social Metrics Get more Strikerless. IP Whois Get more Strikerless. Safety status of Strikerless. Google Safe Browsing reports its status as safe.

Latest check 14 days ago. Strikerless — Dare to think outside the box Global rank Daily visitors 1. Worldwide Audience Compare it to Top Countries United Kingdom Top Ranks United Kingdom 46 India Traffic Analysis Compare it to

0 thoughts on “Strikerless

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *